Mircea Olaru, ROU. |
Can
the Efficiency of swimmer be calculated objective mathematically?
Usually
performance timer, give real appreciation regarding the value of an athlete.
But swimming sport became so popular and has so many facets that preparing a beginner perspective requires to swim as accurately and efficiently from one season to another.
But swimming sport became so popular and has so many facets that preparing a beginner perspective requires to swim as accurately and efficiently from one season to another.
Many coaches use only the timer and various types of workout plans [volume, intensity, complexity] Such efforts often assessed resume to 'how much fatigue was defeated by sport'?
But the correct swimming technique for the competitive process demonstrates that performance is matched with what looks timer [which 'says' how] but what looks 'like you do' confrontation between personal needs and possibilities effort had sports.
For example. - Which is better between these two athletes who both swim the same distance, same performance but one uses a smaller number of rowing over the other?
I, and many others will say, logically, that he who swims with fewer rowing is more efficient.
Efficiency evaluation would count just about rowing and thus might even make another classification ... but efficiency also depends on their somatic biotype of the swimming, so if both swam the same, and even an equal number of rowing who could be said better, more efficient: - who is small and who is chubby or long and thin?
So effectively, the 'art of swimming' is a dimension that is important and it would be better for it to be calculated objectively mathematically.
I advocate a simple formula that can be calculated mentally every workout and why not even racing the 'swim effectively' competitions will be different from those approved by FINA - Rules.
Formula by which we can calculate the efficiency of a swimmer mathematical value takes into account the following data:
1.Time indicated by the clock over a distance on [the rule 50m]
2. Number of rowing used ... and
3.The value of the Personal Glide Index (PGI) [this index is quasi-constant, but different from the swimmer to swimmer] Taking into account that we could do strictly constant value - objective differentiation of what we mean by efficiency in swimming.
Here is the formula "the Biomechanical Efficiency Test Swimming / BEST"> PGI - [Time + Tempo] = ..... points of Efficiency.
{{PGI is the value resulting from the sum of body weight on land, gathered to measure the number of inches in axillary circumference chest (like the stylist ...), the amount to be deducted from total body height of the swimmer lying in a position horizontal floating-ventral}} for example: Length is 210cm - [30 20] ... = 160 points
** NB: PGI is very necessary if competitions were held in mass, with many swimmers obviously different in biotype-somatic and series could be organized perfectly equal by value PGI **
Final conclusion: within the practical experience, it was noted that those who fail to swim as fast as they can, using as few rowing ... get to improve technique (!), and correct swimming movements are to the only way to Effective swim [this concept was generated on the efficiency of the meaning of ancient aphorism 'festina lente' ....[see down]
Poate fi calculata matematic,
obiectiv care este Efficiency of
inotatorului ?
De regula performanta, cronometrul, dau
aprecierea reala a valoarii unui
sportiv.
Dar inotul sportiv a devenit atat
de popular si are atatea valente incat pregatirea de perspectiva a unui
incepator cere ca acesta sa inoate cat mai corect si eficient, de la seson la
secon.
Multi antrenori se folosesc doar
de cronometru si planifica diferite formule de antrenament [volum, intensitate,
complexitate]; de multe ori efortul astfel evaluat se rezuma doar la 'cata
oboseala a fost invinsa de sportiv'?
Dar cel care inoata corect,
tehnica procedeului de concurs, demonstreaza ca performanta nu este egala doar
cu ceea ce arata cronometrul [care 'spune' how] ci si de ceea ce arata 'cum ai
rezolvat' confruntarea intre cerintele efortului si posibilitatile personale avute
de sportiv.
De ex. - care este mai eficient
intre acesti doi sportivi :Amandoi inoata aceiasi distanta, aceiasi performanta
dar unul foloseste un numar mai mic de vasliri fata de celalalt ?
Eu, si inca multi altii vor spune,
logic, ca cel care inoata cu mai putine vasliri este mai Eficient.
Evaluarea Eficientei s-ar rezuma
doar la numararea vaslirilor si astfel s-ar putea face chiar un alt clasament
..., dar Eficienta mai depinde si de
Biotipul-au somatic al celui care inoata; deci daca amandoi inotat la fel, si
chiar au un numar egal de vasliri cine ar putea fi declarat mai bun, mai
eficient:- cel care este mic si dolofan sau cel care este lung si subtire?
Deci Eficienta, in interiorul
'artei de a inota' este o dimensiune care devine importanta si bine ar fi ca ea
sa fie calculata obiectiv, matematic.
Eu pledez pentru o formula simpla,
care poate fi calculata mental, la fiecare antrenament si, dece nu chiar la intreceri de 'inot eficient',
intreceri care vor fi diferite fata de cele aprobate de FINA - Rules.
Formula dupa care se poate calcula
matematic valoarea Eficientei unui inotator are in vedere urmatoarele date:
1.Time indicat de cronometru pe o
distanta data [ de regula pe 50m]
2. Numarul de vasliri folosite...
si
3.Valoarea Indecelui Personal de
Alunecare [ acest indice este cvazi-constant, dar diferit la de inotator la
inotator]; Introducand in calcul aceasta valoare constanta vom putea face
strict - o diferentiere obiectiva a ceea ce intelegem prin Eficienta la inot.
Iata formula "the Biomechanical
Efficiency Swimming Test / BEST" > PIG - [Time + Tempo] = ..... points
of Efficiency.
{{ PIG reprezinta valoarea care
rezulta din suma greutatii corporale pe uscat, adunata cu numarul de centimetri
care masoara circumefrinta sub axilara a toracelui (ca la croitor...), suma
care va fi scazuta din lungimnea totala a corpului inotatorului intins in
pozitia de plutire orizontal-ventrala}} de exemplu: Lungimea este 210cm -
[30+20] ...= 160 points
**Obs: PIG este foarte necesar
daca s-ar organiza intreceri de massa, cu multi inotatori, evident diferiti ca
Biotip-somatic iar seriile ar putea fi organizate perfect egal dupa valoarea
PIG**
CONCLUZIA FINALA: din experienta
practica, s-a remarcat, ca cei care reusesc sa inoate cat pot ei de repede,
folosind cat mai putine vasliri ..., ajung sa perfectioneze tehnica (!!!),
corectitudinea miscarilor de inot fiiind singura cale de a inota Eficient [
acest concept referitor la Eficienta a fost generat de intelesul unui aforism
antic 'Festina lente'....
Suetonius dupa o veche cronica germana |
Festina lente - are si o emblema antica.... |
No comments:
Post a Comment